Toyota RAV4 vs Mazda CX-5

These are the two default choices in Australia's biggest new-car class. Both seat five, both drive all four wheels and both cover the family-SUV basics well. The real difference is how they are powered, what they cost to run, and how the cabin feels once you move past the entry grade.

The verdict

Put simply: the RAV4 costs less to run, the CX-5 costs less to buy. Every RAV4 is a hybrid and uses around 4.6L/100km against the Mazda's 7.4, and it is the only one of the two you can plug in, with XSE and GR Sport versions that cover most daily driving on electric power before the petrol engine takes over. The CX-5 answers with a starting price about $6,000 lower, all-wheel drive on every grade where the Toyota charges extra for it, and a cabin that feels a step plusher as you climb the range.

There are smaller trade-offs on top. The RAV4 has the bigger boot and cheaper servicing, at $325 a visit. The CX-5 tows 300kg more and already holds a 5-star ANCAP rating, where the new-generation RAV4 has not been crash-tested yet. Neither is a wrong answer, so it comes down to what you value more: the lowest fuel bills, or a lower price and a nicer interior.

Compare them spec for spec

Specs and prices change with each grade and configuration, so the fairest comparison is at the exact versions you are weighing up. Line them up side by side, down to the grade, in the interactive tool.

Compare RAV4 & CX-5

More guides

Last updated August 2026